Class 13 Stat701 Fall 1997

Weighted Least Squares and Monte Carlo Simulation.

Todays class.

Plan:

*
Review: unbiased and efficient.
*
Summarize Ordinary Least squares under heteroscedasticity.
*
Consider options and their properties.
*
Discuss Monte Carlo simulations.
*
Look at simulation results.
*
Data analysis example -- housing prices and pollution.

What makes a good estimate?

A good estimator, tex2html_wrap_inline58 of a population parameter tex2html_wrap_inline60 has at least two properties:

*
On average it takes on the correct value, that is tex2html_wrap_inline62 : UNBIASED
*
It is most concentrated around the true value: EFFICIENT

Monte Carlo studies.

*
A stochastic extension of scenario analysis.
*
Best case scenario
*
Typical case scenario
*
Worst case scenario

*
Problem: they are not equally likely to happen
*
Would like to include in the overall evaluation the probability/frequency that each scenario happens.
*
Monte Carlo refinement: let the computer randomly generate the scenarios (many of them - hopefully with frequencies in accordance with reality) and evaluate strategies over these random draws.
*
Generate a world - evaluate an action on that world.
*
Potentially much more informative - for example can talk about the ``chances'' that an event happens.
*
Downside - if computer generates incongruent scenarios then get garbage.
*
Very effective when mechanism to generate world is simple but evaluating an action in that world is complex, e.g. simple models for the market (the world) but need to price a complex derivative (the action)
*
The foundation for the analysis: the Law of Large Numbers (maybe the colloquial law of averages)

displaymath64

Apply to indicators of an event happening: then in English proportion of times that an event happens in the simulation tends to the probability that the event happens.

Simulation results.

Housing data example.

Check: Does the statement
the long run probability that it rains tomorrow is 0.3
confuse you.

It shouldn't: the term long run has nothing to do with way into the future. It just means averaging over an increasing number of events.



Richard Waterman
Mon Oct 20 22:02:16 EDT 1997